Bug#473951: gtk-doc: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: openjade(still installed)

Sebastian Dröge slomo at circular-chaos.org
Wed Apr 2 17:39:57 UTC 2008


On Mi, 2008-04-02 at 19:20 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 02/04/08 at 19:16 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > severity 473951 important
> > thanks
> > 
> > On Mi, 2008-04-02 at 12:33 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Package: gtk-doc
> > > Version: 1.10-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > > User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
> > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080401 qa-ftbfs
> > > Justification: FTBFS on i386
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
> > > 
> > > Likely to be caused by one of your build-deps depending on openjade.
> > 
> > I can't reproduce this with an up to date sid. Could it be that your
> > build environment was confused by the conditional "openjade | jade
> > | ..." dependencies of one of the build dependencies? An Ubuntu buildd
> > had the same problem some time ago...
> > 
> > I'm lowering the severity to important now...
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Yes, sbuild doesn't support a | b build-dependencies (it always picks
> a).

So that's a bug in sbuild then, right?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20080402/b6f2af4c/attachment.pgp 


More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list