Bug#466619: marked as done (should evince have a dependency on ghostscript-x?)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner at bugs.debian.org
Fri Mar 14 17:06:10 UTC 2008


Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:47:04 +0000
with message-id <E1JaD3g-0006rj-Um at ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#466619: fixed in evince 2.22.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #466619,
regarding should evince have a dependency on ghostscript-x?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
466619: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=466619
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: andrew bezella <dovienya at diatribes.org>
Subject: should evince have a dependency on ghostscript-x?
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:54:54 -0800
Size: 5284
Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20080314/25b24e5e/attachment.eml 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he at debian.org>
Subject: Bug#466619: fixed in evince 2.22.0-1
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:47:04 +0000
Size: 5175
Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20080314/25b24e5e/attachment-0001.eml 


More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list