Bug#520484: backtrace

Ryan Niebur ryanryan52 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 24 17:45:24 UTC 2009


Hi!

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 06:27:24PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> 
> Thanks. This trace looks a bit suspicious, it would be nice if you could
> reproduce it without build optimisations (build with
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt).
> 

Sorry, I told Carlo that I didn't need access to his system anymore,
so I won't be able to do any further debugging on this for now. I
assume that since I provided a test case that somebody else can handle
it from here. Can't you just use a porter box for this?

Thanks,
Ryan

-- 
_________________________
Ryan Niebur
ryanryan52 at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20090324/2b36eca3/attachment.pgp 


More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list