Bug#557118: libgnomekbd3 should Replace libgnomekbd2
Tony Nelson
tonynelson at georgeanelson.com
Fri Nov 20 18:11:14 UTC 2009
On 09-11-20 06:42:49, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 19 novembre 2009 à 12:14 -0500, Tony Nelson a écrit :
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > libgnomekbd2: Depends: libgnomekbd-common (= 2.22.0-1) but
> 2.26.0-1 is to be installed.
> > gnome-desktop-environment: Conflicts: gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs but
> 0.10.25-1 is to be installed.
> > sysvinit-utils: Conflicts: chkconfig (< 11.0-79.1-2) but
> 11.0-79.1-1 is installed and it is kept back.
> > The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
> >
> > Remove the following packages:
> > gnome
> > gnome-desktop-environment
> > libgnomekbd2
> > libgnomekbdui2
> >
> > (ignore sysvinit-utils above)
>
> Looks to me like aptitude being on crack, as usual. Does apt-get (or
> other working frontends) give better results?
No, they didn't (I tried various ways for a while and then gave up),
and I don't think any of them were wrong. libgnomekbd2 was replaced by
libgnomekbd3, but libgnomekbd3 did not say so, so package dependency
resolution failed.
> > AIUI, libgnomekbd3 replaces libgnomekbd2, and if the package said
> > so, there would not have been a confict and perhaps the removal of
> > gnome would not have been suggested.
>
> libgnomekbd2 should be removed by the upgrade.
By what? libgnomekbd3 does not seem to obsolete it. Does some other
thing say to remove it? I don't know enough about Debian packaging to
say.
--
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson at georgeanelson.com>
' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>
More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list