Gnome without Gecko (?)

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:39:23AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Mike Hommey wrote:
>>> It is my understanding that the current gnome packages in experimental
>>> are all Gecko-clean. Is my understanding right, and if it is, do you
>>> have an idea as to when these packages may migrate to unstable ? That
>>> would help me a lot to get xulrunner-1.9.1 in unstable ;)
>> It is, although some of those using gecko aren't in experimental (e.g. yelp). I
>> guess we will upload them to unstable by the time GNOME 2.28 is released, which
>> is in one week.
> 
> Apart from devhelp, epiphany and yelp, what are the packages that drop
> theit gecko dependency ?

epiphany-extensions too. seahorse-plugins doesn't yet (it should to have an
encryption plugin in epiphany/webkit), the bug tracking it is [1].

gnome-python-extras builds python-gtkmozembed, so it will continue build
depending on xulrunner.

I think that's all.

Best,
Emilio

[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590724

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20090916/51f3f187/attachment.pgp>