Bug#578279: marked as done (evince: Is relying on dbus & gconf really necessary?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:57:34 +0200
with message-id <4BCB39FE.6040708 at debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#578279: evince: Is relying on dbus & gconf really necessary?
has caused the Debian Bug report #578279,
regarding evince: Is relying on dbus & gconf really necessary?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
578279: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578279
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Mike Edwards <pf-debian-bugs at mirkwood.net>
Subject: evince: Is relying on dbus & gconf really necessary?
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:45:24 -0400
Size: 5494
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20100418/8698c211/attachment.eml>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu at debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#578279: evince: Is relying on dbus & gconf really necessary?
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:57:34 +0200
Size: 3665
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20100418/8698c211/attachment-0001.eml>