Bug#567056: brasero: Brasero is very slow burning a data DVD-R
Thomas Schmitt
scdbackup at gmx.net
Thu Feb 11 21:41:49 UTC 2010
Hi,
for some reason i did not get the last two
mails from Leandro.
Only good that George brought me back to the
topic.
I propose to next explore libisofs without a
burn process being involved.
If Brasero can burn to a disk file as "drive"
target, then try whether it is as slow as with
optical media.
Another test would be to install xorriso.
E.g. by
apt-get source libisoburn
or from source
http://scdbackup.sourceforge.net/xorriso-0.4.8.pl01.tar.gz
build by:
tar xzf ..../xorriso-0.4.8.pl01.tar.gz
cd xorriso-0.4.8
./configure
make
make install (or execute as ./xorriso/xorriso)
One my run it by its mkisofs emulation
xorriso -as mkisofs -o /dev/null \
-R -J \
file_or_dir_1 file_or_dir_2 ...
which will tell no speed numbers.
Or by its own CLI
xorriso -outdev stdio:/dev/null \
-add file_or_dir_1 file_or_dir_2 ...
which will give a progress report with DVD speed
measurements
xorriso : UPDATE : Writing: 3257s 0.5% fifo 0% buf 50%
xorriso : UPDATE : Writing: 20875s 3.0% fifo 0% buf 50% 62.7xD
...
xorriso : UPDATE : Writing: 664063s 96.8% fifo 0% buf 50% 56.4xD
ISO image produced: 685604 sectors
This is on a 3000 MHz AMD. About 20 times faster
than you experience with Brasero.
If this works fast, then you should try a
dummy run with DVD-R:
xorriso -outdev /dev/sr0 -dummy on \
-add file_or_dir_1 file_or_dir_2 ...
If any of the xorriso tests is slow, then i will
have to invent a theory and some experiments to
verify it.
(Any hint is welcome then.)
If they all are fast, then one will have to
search the bottleneck in Brasero.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list