[Squeeze] RFC and votes: Behaviour of update-notifier in Squeeze release

[Josselin Mouette]

Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 21:20 +0200, Julian Andres Klode a écrit : 
> The default is Ubuntu's behavior and this actually makes sense
> in my opinion, although we might want to decrease the interval
> in which update-manager is run. And once Bug#579789 is fixed,
> it would even work.
> 
> In my opinion, we should keep Ubuntu's behavior, as it will
> make things easier from a packaging point of view (reply -1
> after quoting this paragraph to vote against it, makes it
> easy to analyse the results).

I don’t like it much. The user doesn’t necessarily have the
authorizations to install these updates. I prefer to just keep the icon
as in previous versions.

If we want to install updates automatically, there’s unattended-upgrades
for that effect.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.      Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'  “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
  `-    […] I will see what I can do for you.”  -- Jörg Schilling
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20100503/cd2b225c/attachment.pgp>