Bug#579160: Fwd: Raw image and imagemagick

[Fabian Greffrath]

Am 21.05.2010 16:54, schrieb Hubert Chathi:
> I'll also split ufraw-batch into a separate package, to reduce the size
> of the default install. (Probably the majority of users don't do raw
> processing.)

Great news, thank you very much. However, if you really split 
ufraw-batch into a separate package and other tools recommend this 
package for batch processing (which I highly appreciate), you should 
maybe keep the ufraw icon visible in the menu. The rationale is that 
you can expect the ufraw package to be installed on user demand then, 
other packages would just have pulled in ufraw-batch.