RFS: gnome-shell-extensions

Michael Biebl biebl at debian.org
Sun Nov 6 17:37:14 UTC 2011

Am 06.11.2011 14:57, schrieb Victor Seva:
> 2011/11/6 Leo 'costela' Antunes <costela at debian.org>:
>> On 06/11/11 12:34, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>> Since there is no extension manager in 3.0, I think we should start this
>>> package from gnome-shell 3.2 (currently sitting in experimental). This
>>> way there would be no need for this hair-splitting
>>> one-extension-per-package which only makes things more complicated.
>> I imagine you probably heard this question a thousand times already, but
>> do you have a rough time-frame for 3.2 entering unstable?
>> If it's still months away, I'd suggest uploading it as-is now, because
>> IMHO its usefulness outweighs the slight annoyance of having to manually
>> disable the unwanted extensions after installing (and I imagine we're
>> only talking about sid/testing here, as the released version will
>> probably be ">= 3.2").
> Yes, I think if the time frame is long as months, we can start with this
> one-extension-per-package. I think our users would like so.

The 3.0 transition is mostly finished, should be a matter of days.
A lot of 3.2 packages are already sitting in experimental (including
gnome-shell 3.2), so expect them to be uploaded to unstable soon.


Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20111106/b6227cca/attachment.pgp>

More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list