Bug#616150: severity of Bug#616150: is important

[Micha Lenk]

Hi Michael,

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:24:31PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> severity 616150 important
> thanks

Can you please provide a reason why you think that a repeatedly reported
segfault of gnucash in the Gtk+ library can be considered of lower severity
than serious? This has just been reported once again in [0]#644930, so I
believe a higher severity is appropriate. If you do not object within the next
two weeks, I'll set the severity back to 'serious'.

A patch that fixes the problem is available in the [1]bug logs. So far I've
seen no feedback, but any comments on the proposed fix or why it isn't
appropriate are more than welcome...

 0. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644930
 1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=57;filename=fix_null_pointer_segfault.patch;att=2;bug=616150

Regards,
Micha