Comments regarding gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-2.1_amd64.changes
jcristau at debian.org
Thu Dec 27 14:39:39 UTC 2012
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:36:53 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Josselin Mouette <joss at debian.org> wrote:
> > Le dimanche 25 novembre 2012 à 22:54 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 22:52:49 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> > Le dimanche 25 novembre 2012 à 21:09 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> >> > > > Unless there's a particular reason m-a support in this package is a
> >> > > > priority, I would prefer to defer that part.
> >> > > >
> >> > > Hrm. Seems like this has landed still with a package split in addition
> >> > > to the RC bug fix. Why?
> >> >
> >> > The package split *is* the RC bug fix.
> >> >
> >> The changelog suggests the RC bug fix is splitting out accessibility
> >> stuff. There seems to be another new package, with no other
> >> justification than "lintian". That is the one I'm questioning.
> > Ah sorry, I didn’t parse your sentence correctly.
> > Indeed this split is among the “good to have” stuff but was certainly
> > not worth breaking the freeze.
> Actually, my intention was to do the split more completely.
> So, I took the lintian warning as the indicator of my incompleteness.
> And I thought there was no objection from the several reviews.
> So, I still kept it.
> Do you want me to undo it by another upload?
One further issue with this split: the gnome-themes-standard.mo files in
/usr/share/locale are gone, as far as I can tell.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers