Bug#682481: gnome-shell: epiphany shouldn't be the default browser

Julien Cristau jcristau at debian.org
Mon Jul 23 09:17:43 UTC 2012


On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:55:49 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:

> Le lundi 23 juillet 2012 à 10:46 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : 
> > Package: gnome-shell
> > Version: 3.4.1-8
> > Severity: serious
> > 
> > The default browser should be one that has at least vaguely credible
> > security support, IMO.  epiphany doesn't qualify, chromium or iceweasel
> > probably would.
> 
> As explained on IRC, they would if at the *very least* they supported
> GTK3.
> 
I don't think "doesn't support gtk3" can be more of a blocker than "has
0 security support".  I agree it's not ideal, but it doesn't seem
there's much of a choice.

Cheers,
Julien
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20120723/4259de12/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list