Removing block-udeb gtk+3.0?

[Michael Biebl]

On 26.09.2012 16:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> since gtk+3.0 again appeared on my testing summary page (packages of
> interest as far as unblock{,-udeb}'s are concerned), I'm wondering
> whether it shouldn't just get its block-udeb removed?
> 
> I haven't heard yet of plans to port d-i to gtk3, and that wouldn't
> happen during the wheezy release cycle anyway, so removing that
> block-udeb would spare some questions/brain cycles on the -boot/-release
> side when considering unblock{,-udeb}'s. Don't you think?

Makes sense, imo.

Michael
-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20120926/07bbcd1a/attachment.pgp>