Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous
Martin-Éric Racine
martin-eric.racine at iki.fi
Tue Mar 12 04:59:01 UTC 2013
2013/3/12 Julian Andres Klode <jak at debian.org>:
> Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management
> stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those
> old components are still in wheezy however, and especially update-manager can
> be considered to be horribly dangerous: It might break systems or contain extreme
> security issues as it has not seen someone really care about it since 2 years.
>
> We cannot simply remove update-manager however, as there are reverse
> dependencies. The most important ones appear to be:
>
> * upgrade-system
> * update-notifier
>
> We could simply drop upgrade-system from testing. For update-notifier, we cannot
> do this, as update-notifier-kde depends on update-notifier-common, and there are
> no other notifiers for KDE AFAIK. I could however upload an empty update-notifier
> package (for GNOME) that switches the user to the PackageKit notifier, thus
> removing that reverse dependency.
>
> Summary of the proposed solution:
> 1. Remove upgrade-system from testing
I really don't see the point in removing upgrade-system from Testing,
since the dependency relationship is merely a Suggests.
Martin-Éric
More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list