Bug#702976: epiphany-browser: domainname not checked on https

Christoph Anton Mitterer calestyo at scientia.net
Wed Mar 13 23:15:17 UTC 2013


On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 23:23 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I don’t even see it as a bug. 
Of course it is...
Otherwise I could easily mitm every connection... o.O

> Epiphany treats the first site as a self-signed one, which thus has the
> same level of security as a non-encrypted connection.
And Ephiphany silently accepts self-signeds one? Even then if cert and
domain don't match?

I can't quite follow your points...


> When you are redirected, however, it is the responsibility of the user
> to check the domain name the connection is certified for.
No... cause you can never now where a site redirects you or form which
other domains it loads objects... e.g. google.com and friends load a lot
of stuff from other google domains like gstatic or whatever.

https guarantees this cause you know the entry domain, and when
communication with that is valid (which epiphany apparently does not
check) you assume that your peer wouldn't redirect/lead you to other
domains (with valid certs) unless it's intended.
If you put that into the responsibility of the user the whole system
immediately fails.


Again,.... can't quite follow your points... just try it with one of the
other big browsers... they warn you before any redirect.



> You could argue that, when faced with a non-certified https connection,
> epiphany should not follow redirections without a warning, but I’m not
> even sure upstream would agree, and I definitely don’t think this is a
> RC bug.
Well... SSL useless... sounds like RC to me.


Cheers,
Chris.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5113 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20130314/b102f41b/attachment-0002.bin>


More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list