Bug#760102: gnome keyring & gpg agent

Michael Biebl biebl at debian.org
Fri Jun 5 17:04:47 UTC 2015


Am 05.06.2015 um 15:55 schrieb Neal H. Walfield:
> Hi Stef,
> 
> At Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:37:26 +0200,
> Stef Walter wrote:
>> Confirming that I'll be ready to remove the code once the new pinentry
>> makes it into a release. Removing code always makes me smile :)
> 
> A new pinentry with the code has already been released (0.9.3).

Just to be clear here: this new pinentry-gnome3 and gnupg-agent, do they
both work with either gnupg and gnupg2?

@Joss: related to that, I notice, that you added a versioned dependency
on gnupg (>= 1.4.7) to the seahorse package in 2008.
Is this still valid today? Or should we either drop that dependency or
replace it with something like Depends: gnupg2 | gnupg (>= 1.4.7)

I have no strong preference which one we pick as default, as long as it
works properly. So I'd leave the judgement to those more familiar with
the advantages/disadvantags of gnupg vs gnupg2

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20150605/a5838536/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list