gspell_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Rene Engelhard]

Hi,

Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> unfortunately I have to reject your package.                                    
> According to the Reject FAQ "debian/control breakage #2" all binary             
> packages need to be mentioned in your debian/control. This does not             
> seem to be the case for libgspell-1-1-dbgsym.                                   
>                                                                                
> Please reupload the package after you fixed this AFD issue.   

And later:

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:00:20AM +0000, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >The requirement to have the dbgsym packages listed in debian/control is
> >news to me. I thought the point was that dbgsym packages are
> >autogenerated and need no further preparation by the maintainer.
> 
> oh, no, this is also a real bad AFD issue ...

I don't believe this is a good subject for AFD jokes. Especially as
Tanguys reupload was automatically REJEDTED because the signature was
already known.[1] 

Requiring a rebuild (or resign) just for a joke crossed the line a bit much,
sorry.

Regards,

Rene

[1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/2016-April/125624.html