squeeze update of librsvg?
Santiago Ruano Rincón
santiagorr at riseup.net
Tue Jan 19 14:29:50 UTC 2016
El 18/01/16 a las 08:57, Salvatore Bonaccorso escribió:
> Hi Santiago,
> Sorry for the late reply.
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 07:06:35PM +0100, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > Hi,
> > El 30/12/15 a las 01:49, Ben Hutchings escribió:
> > > Hello dear maintainer(s),
> > >
> > > the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> > > currently open in the Squeeze version of librsvg:
> > > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-7557
> > > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-7558
> > Regarding Squeeze and AFAICS, while the fix for CVE-2015-7557 is simple,
> > the CVE-2015-7558 is not trivial. It has been fixed by many changes in the
> > checks of cyclic references, using the new rsvg_acquire_node function
> > (i.e. https://git.gnome.org/browse/librsvg/commit/?id=a51919f7e1ca9c535390a746fbf6e28c8402dc61).
> > I cannot find info about how CVE-2015-7558 is exploitable, but I'd say
> > that is no-dsa. What do you think? What's the security team position
> > about it?
> I have marked one issue as no-dsa for wheezy- and jessie
I had prepared a squeeze package to fix it, and even if it isn't a
critical issue, I prefer to upload it given that the work is done.
> Regarding CVE-2015-7558, not sure here. But if the
> fix is too intrusive to backport we can mark it as <no-dsa> (Too
> intrusive to backport).
At least for Squeeze, it's indeed too intrusive. I haven't taken a look
yet into Wheezy or Jessie.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers