Bug#811607: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 6: nonnull argument compared to NULL)

Thu Mar 3 01:03:10 UTC 2016

Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:02:00 -0800
with message-id <20160303010200.GA5070 at jirafa.cyrius.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#811607: FTBFS with GCC 6: nonnull argument compared to NULL
has caused the Debian Bug report #811607,
regarding FTBFS with GCC 6: nonnull argument compared to NULL
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
811607: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811607
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm at hpe.com>
Subject: FTBFS with GCC 6: nonnull argument compared to NULL
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:15:07 -0800
Size: 13246
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20160303/35bf8710/attachment-0002.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm at hpe.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#811607: FTBFS with GCC 6: nonnull argument compared to NULL
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:02:00 -0800
Size: 2495
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20160303/35bf8710/attachment-0003.mht>