Bug#844924: pygobject: FTBFS: Tests failures

Michael Biebl biebl at debian.org
Sun Nov 20 01:58:56 UTC 2016


Am 20.11.2016 um 02:45 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> On 20/11/16 01:44, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 19.11.2016 um 08:03 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
>>> Source: pygobject
>>> Version: 3.22.0-1
>>> Severity: serious
>>> Tags: stretch sid
>>> User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
>>> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
>>> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
>>> amd64.
>>>
>>> Relevant part (hopefully):
>>>> if 'generic-c-marshaller' in GObject.features:
>>>> ^
>>>> pygtkcompat/pygtkcompat.py:102:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
>>>> _unset = object()
>>>> ^
>>
>> Looks like pep8 got stricter (again).
>> There were some new upstream releases just recently.
>> I got some build failures in other packages as well.
>>
>> Somehow I think it would be good to avoid such uploads so close to the
>> freeze or better coordinate uploads of pep8.
>>
>> Would it be possible to re-compile reverse build-dependencies of pep8
>> before a new major upstream release? Somehow this feels like it should
>> be treated like a (library) transtion.
> 
> I don't think so.

No to what exactly?


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20161120/e5680e24/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list