Bug#841098: closed by Andreas Henriksson <andreas at fatal.se> (Re: Bug#841098: not fixed in rygel 0.32.1-1)

Guillem Jover guillem at debian.org
Sun Oct 23 14:35:31 UTC 2016


Control: reopen -1

Hi!

On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 20:15:06 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:14:11 +0200
> From: Andreas Henriksson <andreas at fatal.se>
> To: Santiago Vila <sanvila at unex.es>
> Cc: 841098-done at bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#841098: not fixed in rygel 0.32.1-1
> Message-ID: <20161020201411.GA27559 at fatal.se>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
>  RP_MATCHES_RCVD,VERSION autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
>  version=3.4.0-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

> The above mentioned upload was done as a source-only upload.
> It built successfully not only in my local environment but also on *all*
> architectures (and thus on atleast one buildd for each architecture).

> This is obviously a problem in your environment.

As Santiago has shown this has also happened on the buildds, very
recent example being:

  <https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rygel&arch=ppc64el&ver=0.32.0-2&stamp=1475601506>
  <https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rygel&arch=s390x&ver=0.32.0-1&stamp=1474571422>

And he can still reproduce it. If this is, say, a timing issue, then it
might not always manifest itself. It does not mean it's not present. A
segfault in the buildds is a clear indication this is not an imagined
situation.

> The debian bug tracking system is not a support forum. If you need
> personal support, then you need to negotiate a support contract first.
> The debian bug tracking system is not the place for this.

I'm sorry to say but I feel this comment is inappropriate. Santiago is
doing distro-wide QA, I'd even go as far as to hazard he does not even
use this package at all!

Thanks,
Guillem



More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list