glom_1.30.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Jeremy Bicha]

Thorsten or any other ftpmasters,

Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do for this
package. I haven't gotten any replies since the original rejection so
I re-uploaded to the NEW queue 2 months ago.

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Jeremy Bicha <jbicha at debian.org> wrote:
> Thorsten,
>
> I'm emailing again (this time also addressing your personal email
> address). I need to know whether I should upload now with those
> Lintian errors still outstanding (but will be fixed with next upstream
> release) or whether the LIntian errors need to be fixed before
> acceptance into Debian.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy Bicha
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Jeremy Bicha <jbicha at debian.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz
>> <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
>>> While you are at it, please also take care of:
>>>  E: glom source: source-is-missing docs/libglom_reference/html/jquery.js line length is 32401 characters (>512)
>>>  E: glom source: source-includes-file-in-files-excluded docs/libglom_reference/html/jquery.js
>>
>> All of those Lintian errors are explained in the comment in the
>> debian/copyright header [1]. If that is unsatisfactory, I can
>> 1. drop the Files-Excluded lines, or
>> 2. we can have mismatched tarballs with Ubuntu until the next upstream
>> release, or
>> 3. use a repack suffix for the upstream version number until the next
>> upstream release.
>>
>> I consider it a fairly minor issue since the jquery file affects the
>> source package only, not the binaries. And nearly every package that
>> uses autotools has those unnecessary (for Debian) copies of autotools
>> macros.
>>
>> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glom/blob/debian/master/debian/copyright
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeremy Bicha