glom_1.30.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Jeremy Bicha]

Ping!

Jeremy

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:35 PM Jeremy Bicha <jbicha at debian.org> wrote:
>
> Thorsten or any other ftpmasters,
>
> Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do for this
> package. I haven't gotten any replies since the original rejection so
> I re-uploaded to the NEW queue 2 months ago.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy Bicha
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Jeremy Bicha <jbicha at debian.org> wrote:
> > Thorsten,
> >
> > I'm emailing again (this time also addressing your personal email
> > address). I need to know whether I should upload now with those
> > Lintian errors still outstanding (but will be fixed with next upstream
> > release) or whether the LIntian errors need to be fixed before
> > acceptance into Debian.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeremy Bicha
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Jeremy Bicha <jbicha at debian.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz
> >> <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
> >>> While you are at it, please also take care of:
> >>>  E: glom source: source-is-missing docs/libglom_reference/html/jquery.js line length is 32401 characters (>512)
> >>>  E: glom source: source-includes-file-in-files-excluded docs/libglom_reference/html/jquery.js
> >>
> >> All of those Lintian errors are explained in the comment in the
> >> debian/copyright header [1]. If that is unsatisfactory, I can
> >> 1. drop the Files-Excluded lines, or
> >> 2. we can have mismatched tarballs with Ubuntu until the next upstream
> >> release, or
> >> 3. use a repack suffix for the upstream version number until the next
> >> upstream release.
> >>
> >> I consider it a fairly minor issue since the jquery file affects the
> >> source package only, not the binaries. And nearly every package that
> >> uses autotools has those unnecessary (for Debian) copies of autotools
> >> macros.
> >>
> >> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glom/blob/debian/master/debian/copyright
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jeremy Bicha