Bug#1058687: gnome-shell: ftbfs on riscv64 due to tests failed

[Bo YU]

Control: tags -1 fixed 46.3.1-2

Hi,

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 07:05:22PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
>(cc -= release team, += Mesa)
>
>On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 18:52:58 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On 2023-12-15 11:11, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> > On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 21:59:19 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
...
>the longer term.

The good news is that llvmpipe support riscv64 with orcjit has been
merged[0]!

[0]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/26018
>
>> Alternatively it softpipe should be
>> improved to provide an exact same rendering as llvmpipe.
>
>Some of the bugs I've seen involving mips64el have been "this reftest is
>misrendered by softpipe", and I'm willing to disable those on softpipe
>architectures, especially if a porter for the relevant architecture can
>confirm that on real hardware, everything is fine.
>
>The ones I'm more concerned about are the bugs of the form "this test-case
>crashes when using softpipe", and as far as I can tell, the gnome-shell
>test failures under discussion in this particular bug report are in
>that category: with softpipe, the Shell doesn't render the wrong pixels
>successfully, it just doesn't work at all. But maybe I'm reading the
>log wrong?

New upstream release fixed the issue see[0]:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gnome-shell&arch=riscv64

I have saw some Debian users to run gnome on vf2 but I am failed to
login in gnome on my Unmatched due to others reason. 

Please feel free to reopen this if any issue.

>
>    smcv

-- 
Regards,
--
   Bo YU

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20240724/facaee58/attachment-0001.sig>