Bug#1073234: bookworm-pu: package gdk-pixbuf/2.42.10+dfsg-1+deb12u1

[Salvatore Bonaccorso]

Hi all,

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 07:11:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-06-15 at 08:28 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy, Simon,
> > 
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 06:22:13PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> > > 
> [...]
> > > Salvatore, I pushed commits a few days ago to the debian/bookworm
> > > and
> > > debian/bullseye branches of
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gdk-pixbuf based directly on
> > > similar work that had been done by Ubuntu Security but I hadn't
> > > made
> > > time to do further testing and reach out to Debian Security. Do you
> > > want to use those versions or the version you have prepared now?
> > 
> > Ups, apologies I did no spot that you did as well already the work.
> > 
> > If you prefer to have your version included for the point-release we
> > can ask there SRM to reject my version and you can upload your one
> > (notice to please change the target distribtuion to 'bookworm' for
> > the point release update).
> > 
> > As you have already done as well the bullseye one, can you fille a
> > bullseye-pu request + upload for bullseye-pu as well?
> > 
> > Just let here know if you want 
> > 
> > gdk-pixbuf | 2.42.10+dfsg-1+deb12u1 | stable-new      | source
> > 
> > rejected in favour of your version.
> 
> Ping on this, as we're getting closer to the freeze windows.

Friendly ping as the window is closing on sunday.

Otherwise can we have the uploaded and pending in stable-new version
accepted for the point release?

Notabene, I did not managed yet to work on the bullseye version as
well, which would be convinient to have as well included in the
upcoming point release.

Regards,
Salvatore