Bug#1082505: Unclear dependency on libvte-2.91-0
128 at gmx.us
128 at gmx.us
Sat Sep 21 10:26:17 BST 2024
This is what changed today on my machine. Debian testing.
Upgrade: libblockdev-part3:amd64 (3.1.1-2, 3.2.0-2), libblockdev-swap3:amd64 (3.1.1-2, 3.2.0-2), libvte-2.91-gtk4-0:amd64 (0.77.92-1, 0.78.0-1), libblockdev-fs3:amd64 (3.1.1-2, 3.2.0-2), libblockdev-loop3:amd64 (3.1.1-2, 3.2.0-2), libvte-2.91-common:amd64 (0.77.92-1, 0.78.0-1), libblockdev3:amd64 (3.1.1-2, 3.2.0-2), libblockdev-utils3:amd64 (3.1.1-2, 3.2.0-2), libblockdev-mdraid3:amd64 (3.1.1-2, 3.2.0-2), libblockdev-nvme3:amd64 (3.1.1-2, 3.2.0-2), libblockdev-crypto3:amd64 (3.1.1-2, 3.2.0-2)
Install: gnome-terminal-data:amd64 (3.54.0-1, automatic), gnome-terminal:amd64 (3.54.0-1), libvte-2.91-0:amd64 (0.78.0-1, automatic)
> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2024 at 11:20 AM
> From: "Simon McVittie" <smcv at debian.org>
> To: 128 at gmx.us, 1082505 at bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#1082505: Unclear dependency on libvte-2.91-0
>
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 at 11:02:22 +0200, 128 at gmx.us wrote:
> > After updating libvte-2.91-gtk4-0 from version 0.77.92-1 to 0.78.0-1,
> > gnome-console would not start. Installing libvte-2.91-0 fixes the issue.
>
> Did anything else change in the same apt transaction where you installed
> libvte-2.91-0? Please look at /var/log/apt/history.log and
> /var/log/apt/term.log.
>
> (For example, perhaps upgrading libvte-2.91-gtk4-0 didn't initially
> upgrade libvte-2.91-common, but installing libvte-2.91-0 pulled in a
> newer version?)
>
> Thanks,
> smcv
>
More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list