Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila
Jeremy Bícha
jeremy.bicha at canonical.com
Wed Feb 12 16:32:35 GMT 2025
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:25 AM Andreas Tille <andreas at an3as.eu> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> I'm fine with both actions:
>
> 1. Adding you (and anybody else who wants to) to Uploaders of
> the package maintained by the Debian TeX maintainers
>
> 2. You move the package to the GNOME team and add yourself
>
> As far as I understood Hilmar the latter is his prefered solution and
> I'm perfectly happy with this. Since I'm not a member of the GNOME team
> I can't do this. If you might make me a member of the GNOME team I
> could finalise the move and upload the package to delayed=10.
Yes, I think it's reasonable for latexila to move to the Debian GNOME
team since it's managed upstream similar to gedit which the team
already maintains. I can work on this soon. I'll need to reimport the
git repo since the Debian GNOME team has a particular style (full
upstream git history with git-buildpackage and DEP-14 branches).
Why the 10-day delay?
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list