Bug#1109262: gdk-pixbuf for trixie?

[Cyril Brulebois]

Simon McVittie <smcv at debian.org> (2025-07-26):
> Thanks for the reminder, but the change is not in any upstream release yet
> and I did get one report of a regression, although I couldn't reproduce it
> and now the reporter can't either (see #1109199). This makes me cautious
> about destabilizing the release, so at this point my inclination is to skip
> that change for 13.0 and either fix it via trixie-security or in 13.1,
> depending on what the security team think. Is that OK from the -boot point
> of view?

Absolutely, that makes total sense! No updates, updates via security, and
updates via point releases are all fine with me; my goal was only to make
sure the upcoming d-i release(s) wouldn't interfere with your plans
regarding this package.

Thanks for the quick answer.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi at debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20250726/394eda2b/attachment-0001.sig>