Bug#1126368: gdm3: autopkgtest depends sssd which isn't in testing

Paul Gevers elbrus at debian.org
Sun Jan 25 15:47:16 GMT 2026


Hi

On 1/25/26 16:23, Simon McVittie wrote:
> So I think the only thing that gdm3 could do to resolve this bug would 
> be to drop the test coverage that tries to detect/avoid regressions when 
> configured to do smart card authentication using sssd, leaving those 
> code paths untested. (Concretely, that would mean dropping "sssd-gdm- 
> smartcard-auth-test", leaving only "greeter".) Is that what the release 
> team wants?


autopkgtest on amd64 and arm64 that fail in testing are already RC for 
years, albeit not much bugs have been filed with that argumentation. 
Regressions of tests in testing have been RC on all release 
architectures [1], again, not a lot of bugs have been filed for that 
reason. Despite the lack of bug reports, it does mean that packages in 
testing shouldn't test depend on something that isn't in testing. We 
should get better in preventing removal of test dependencies, I started 
that discussion some time ago [2], except nothing materialized out of 
that yet.

If sssd seems a lost cause (I somehow doubt that the current situation 
is that, there's quite some activity upstream) than it would be best to 
drop the sssd test in gdm3. As you're all volunteers I can't say how to 
spend your time, but maybe helping sssd maintainers to fix the issue is 
better time spend than removing the test (albeit that might be quicker). 
Once the test is removed, I suspect it might be forgotten to be added 
back once sssd is in testing again.

Paul

[1] https://release.debian.org/testing/rc_policy.txt paragraph 6a.
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=145257#163

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 585 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20260125/7502adfc/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list