Bug#1132301: transition: gnome-shell 50
Simon McVittie
smcv at debian.org
Mon Mar 30 11:23:28 BST 2026
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
X-Debbugs-Cc: gnome-shell at packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:gnome-shell
User: release.debian.org at packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
We now have GNOME Shell 50 in experimental (I'm typing this email into
it) and I've just done the usual MBF asking extensions authors to
update. This will also be the GNOME release used in Ubuntu 26.04 LTS.
Jeremy, Marco: are we ready to ask for a transition slot? (Tagged
moreinfo for now.)
This time, the group of entangled packages is:
* gdm3
* gnome-kiosk
* gnome-remote-desktop
* gnome-session
* gnome-shell
* mutter
all of which are GNOME-team-maintained.
The headline change is that GNOME 50 doesn't support being run as an X11
session using Xorg, at all: it's Wayland or nothing. X11 apps can still
run inside the session via Xwayland as usual.
libgdm1 has an ABI break with no SONAME bump (sigh) as a result of its
X11 functionality being removed, but that library is not widely used and
it seems that the symbols that were removed were only used within gdm3
or by gnome-kiosk, so we can probably get away with using a versioned
Breaks on gnome-kiosk (already present) rather than bumping the package
name to libgdm1a.
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mutter.html tracks the
mutter SONAME bump. When we upload gnome-shell to unstable, it will
presumably also generate an auto-upperlimit- tracker.
Usertagged bugs (all Shell extensions right now, but we can use the same
usertag for any other blockers):
https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?user=pkg-gnome-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org&tag=gnome-shell-50
As usual, the automated tests for gnome-shell and mutter are not as
reliable as we would like, so some retries might be necessary. I'm
reluctant to disable them completely because they're our only
opportunity to find out whether things are completely broken on non-x86,
but we can if we have to.
Thanks,
smcv
More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list