Bug#1038804: libxml++2.6: Old ABI, not recommended for new applications

Dmitry Smirnov onlyjob at debian.org
Fri Sep 4 06:20:03 BST 2026


On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:18:48 +0200 Bastian Germann <bage at debian.org> 
wrote:
> The blocking bugs can be addressed easily now that libxml++-4.0 and
> libxml++-5.0 are in the archive. forky should be released without this
> package.

It is not so "easy" to address the problem when _upstream_ had to
migrate to new libraries. Besides, those libraries are not available
in backports. Let's not rush matters please, and inflate severity.

"Not recommended" does not warrant severity "setious" IMHO.

-- 
All the best,
 Dmitry Smirnov
 GPG key : 4096R/52B6BBD953968D1B

---

There have been times throughout American history where what is right is
not the same as what is legal. Sometimes to do the right thing you have 
to break the law.
 -- Edward Snowden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20260904/71981de1/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list