[Pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#765430: ldd: no version information available (required by /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcrypt.so.20)

Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Thu Oct 16 18:52:16 UTC 2014


On 10/16/2014 01:36 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 libgpg-error0 1.15-1

[...]
> I think it would be a good idea and do not think this is like a
> library transition at all. libgpg-error is up to date in testing
> (1.16). - Bumping the version-dependency of the affected symbols to
> 1.15 in the symbol file will not hurt or delay testing propagation of
> reverse dependencies.
> 
> This more like uploading a new upstream versions of shared
> library (without symbol file) bumping the shlibs. (Which ist still
> allowed.) Just without the possibly negative effect of delaying other
> packages.
> 
> What would make it a little bit like a library transition is if you
> later asked -release to binnmu all libgpg-error reverse dependencies
> to make sure they got a strict dependency. I guess they would do it if
> they had buildd time to spare. But this is a optional second step. If
> -release does not want to, nothing is lost.
> 
> Anyway. Daniel, I am reassigning to libgpg-error0, since that is where
> the fix will need to happen. Please simply send it back if you
> disagree.

Thank you Andreas.  I agree with your reasoning, and am only sorry i
didn't think it through this clearly initially myself :)

I'm hoping to roll out a new libgpg-error later today for other reasons,
and i'll include this change while i'm doing it.

Regards,

	--dkg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnupg-maint/attachments/20141016/2809a0b2/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-gnupg-maint mailing list