[pkg-gnupg-maint] gpgv udebs
Cyril Brulebois
kibi at debian.org
Fri Aug 21 04:49:45 UTC 2015
Hi,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at fifthhorseman.net> (2015-08-19):
> On Wed 2015-08-12 01:51:35 +0200, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> > i believe the installer relies on gpgv for archive manifest signature
> > verification. we have gpgv-udeb for that purpose, i think.
>
> One more followup about gnupg and udebs--
>
> The gnupg packaging currently makes a gnupg-udeb in addition to a
> gpgv-udeb. This post is about gnupg-udeb, and not gpgv-udeb.
eh, thanks for the hint; mixing up those could easily happen.
> I'm proposing to drop the gnupg-udeb entirely.
>
> It looks like it was used at one point in the past for partman-crypto,
> but it is no longer used there.
ACK, removed in:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/partman-crypto.git/commit/?id=4c53c1c57733154689b54bd5abb689f8720b4984
Confirmed by looking at apt-cache showpkg gnupg-udeb in a sid/amd64
chroot (with udeb support).
> I searched here:
>
> http://codesearch.debian.net/results/gnupg-udeb/
>
> and the only places it shows up are the changelong for partman-crypto,
> and a test case for python-debian. the package isn't actually used any
> more.
>
> So i plan to drop the gnupg-udeb in a future release of the gnupg
> package, unless i hear a report that it's something people need.
>
> Anyone want to speak up in favor of keeping it?
Dropping looks good to me, thanks for asking!
Mraw,
KiBi.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnupg-maint/attachments/20150821/a9f3c01f/attachment.sig>
More information about the pkg-gnupg-maint
mailing list