[pkg-gnupg-maint] Debian gnupg2 (2.1.11-7+exp1) experimental

David Kalnischkies david at kalnischkies.de
Tue Apr 26 09:23:05 UTC 2016


On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:33:29AM +0200, Dr. Markus Waldeck wrote:
> > There is no need to from the APT side, apt >= 1.1 calls gpg(v)(2)
> > consistently with single keyring (after potentially merging multiple
> > together with cat as we discussed last year in the apt-vs-gpg2 thread).
> 
> Based on this statement I aligned /var/lib/dpkg/status and removed the 
> dependency on "gnupg | gnupg2". But apt-get worked still fine for me.
> 
> Unfortunately the NEW package apt 1.2.11 depends still on "gnupg | gnupg2".
> WTF?

"WTF?" Relax man. I said what /I/ am thinking as someone who did most of
the apt-key related changes recently, not what the /team/ is thinking
and given that Julian posted a different opinion ealier and Michael
hasn't yet I am not in the mood for a my way or the highway approach.
We maybe deities, but the greek/roman version which aren't perfect and
which have to talk and agree if they don't want to kill each other –
aka the usual problems of polytheism.


Beside, there are still questions open: If Werner as upstream is e.g.
against the cat'ing of the 'simple' keyrings (!= keyboxes) as
a supported interface that whole thread becomes pointless as gnupg is
a hard-dependency of apt then. And of course: What about the requested
(sub)key import in the mentioned wishlist-bug…

Perhaps the idea of not needing gnupg for the basic task of verifying
the signature of a file is all eyewash given that the verify itself can
be done with gpgv, but to setup a suitable environment to run it in gpg
is (maybe) needed…

If you don't have an answer to those questions, please don't "WTF" us as
that is mean and devalues the people & work involved.


Best regards

David Kalnischkies
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnupg-maint/attachments/20160426/735a7da2/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-gnupg-maint mailing list