[pkg-gnupg-maint] packaging GnuPG's wks for debian
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Mon Oct 24 22:55:33 UTC 2016
hey all--
Sandro (hefee) proposes packaging GnuPG's wks client and server for
debian (see attached patch below).
I wanted to see what people think about this. Aside from adding another
loop through the NEW queue (due to the addition of a new package
gnupg-wks), i have a few concerns and questions:
0) Is wks ready for stable distribution? We've seen not insignificant
changes just in the last revision of GnuPG, and there are more
pending for 2.1.16, afaict. Perhaps we should upload it to
experimental instead, and bump the extra work along in a spare
branch (it's a nicely self-contained patchset) without pushing it to
unstable.
1) documentation: it looks like we'd be shipping only gpg-wks-server
and gpg-wks-client. i see no manpages or info pages or anything
comparable. Especially for experimental code that might change
rapidly, it's good to ship contemporaneous documentation.
2) package names: Sandro proposes gnupg-wks. Do we want the gnupg-
prefix? the utilities themselves are prefixed with gpg-wks-, not
gnupg-wks- ; maybe it'd be better to match the binaries? Or perhaps
not at all? Some alternate names for the package i can imagine are:
* wks-tools
* gpg-wks-tools
* gpg-wks
* gnupg-wks-tools
* wks
Any preferences?
3) dependencies: Sandro's patch says Recommends: gnupg | gpgsm but
nothing else. Will these tools actually be useful with neither of
them?
4) do client and server belong together? the server will be running
pretty much independently, if i understand the architecture, and
might have a different set of dependencies. Does it make sense to
bundle them together in the same package?
Thanks for any insight or thoughts or suggestions you might have, and
thanks to Sandro for pushing on this!
--dkg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-build-wks-server-and-client-and-package-it.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 2233 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnupg-maint/attachments/20161024/b25e7724/attachment.patch>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 930 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnupg-maint/attachments/20161024/b25e7724/attachment.sig>
More information about the pkg-gnupg-maint
mailing list