[pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#911189: gpgme-json packaging

[Sébastien Noel]

On Fri, 17 May 2024 11:36:00 +0000 Detlef Eppers <eppers at posteo.de>
wrote:

> That said: naming is important and naming is hard, but three years
> have passed, and it is my impression that this is getting somewhat
> out of proportion.

+1

i have been building my own gpgme packages for the last 5+ years
because of all the indecision & nitpicking.
If it helps, here is an updated branch:
https://salsa.debian.org/twolife/gpgme/-/commits/gpgmejson

details:
- i put the gpgme-json binary in a new 'gpgme-bin' package and not
  'libgpgme-dev' as this is not a dev/debug/test utilitie
- the browser manifests are shipped in the same package, a 5 lines
  json file doesn't justify the overhead of splitting it in another
  package
- thanks to Sascha Wilde for the manpage i stoled in the previous MR

i have the feeling i'm sending this email to /dev/null :'(
graybeards blocking progress because "this is my sacred garden that
young fools will not taint" is unfortunately pretty common in debian
land :'(