[pkg-GNUstep-maintainers] Re: GNUstep Debian package names

[Eric Heintzmann]

	Hi,

On 2004-04-09 08:22:17 +0200 Brent Fulgham <bfulgham@debian.org> wrote:

> On 2004-04-08 14:44:02 -0700 Evan Prodromou <evan@debian.org> wrote:
> 
>> 1. Official parts of the GNUstep system remain 'gnustep-*'. Examples:
>> 
>>      gnustep-guile1
>>      gnustep-web0
>>      gnustep-make
> 
> Agreed.
> 

Should gworkspace be renamed into gnustep-gworkspace. (It is an 
official application) ?

>> 2. Applications that use GNUstep are suffixed with '.app'. Examples:
>> 
>>      preferences.app
>>      terminal.app
>>      gorm.app
>>      projectcenter.app
> 
> Fine, but in many cases not necessary (e.g., 'gorm' is unique).
> 
>> 3. Frameworks use '*-framework' or '*kit', without 'lib*' prefix.
>> 
>>      scriptkit
>>      3dkit
>>      addresses-framework
> 
> I already had netclasses-framework and got bugs filed against it.  
> :-( 
Same bugs reports for addresses-framework, addressview-frmawork and 
addresses-goodies.
( I think the problem is the source package name : addresses )

> We 
> should
> embed 'gnustep' somewhere.  I ended up just using gnustep-netclasses.

or gstep.

	Eric