[Debian GNUstep maintainers] Re: GNUstep packages status

[Eric Heintzmann]

On 2004-12-27 23:07:09 +0100 Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> 
wrote:

> Eric Heintzmann writes:
>> 	Hi Matthias,
>> 
>> I checked GNUstep packages:
>> 
>> Not valid candidates:
>> 	*gnustep-antlr: out of date on arm
>> 	  (antlr is not available on arm)
> 
> not a problem, doesn't depend on gnustep-*

Yes, the version  in sid doesn't depends on libgnustep-base1.10  (and 
I think it's a bug).
But the version in sarge depends on libgnustep-base1.

> 
>> 	*preferences: out of date on s390
>> 	*preview.app: out of date on s390
>> 	*wildmenus.bundle: out of date on s390
> 
> yes, please email s390@buildd.debian.org

Not needed any more, they all have been accepted in sid.

>> several packages have not yet been removes from sarge:
>> 	*addresses
>> 	*gnustep-imagekits
>> 	*charmap
>> 	*lusernet
>> 	*viewpdf
> 
> at least addresses is in unstable as well, so file a bug report (one
> only, maybe severity important) to ftp.debian.org to remove them from
> _unstable_, then they will automatically be removed from
> testing. check carefully which ones are available in unstable.

I've already filed bug to for addresses and gnustep-imagekits. Still 
no reply.
I can try to increase the severity.

charmap, lusernet and viewpdf are not available in unstable.

> 
>> gnustep-gd seems ok, but it still builds depends 
>> libgnustep-base1-dev (>= 
>> 1.5.0-1).
>> Thus, someone could report a RC bug.
> 
> please do, add a patch to the report.

ok

> 
> and please summarize the missing bits for the transition to
> debian-release, with references to the bug reports you file.

ok

	Eric