[pkg-GNUstep-maintainers] Re: GNUStep namespace pollution in
Debian?
Eric Heintzmann
eric@gnustep.fr.st
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:50:42 +0100
On 2004-06-14 18:39:36 +0200 Alex Perez <aperez@student.santarosa.edu>
wrote:
> Eric Heintzmann wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
>>>> Well, this solution doen't satisfy everyone and doesn't solve the
>>>> naming
>>>> problem on frameworks (like netclasses) and libs.
>>>
>>> netclasse.framework_version.deb ?
>>
>> Already refused (like addresses-framework and addressview-framework).
> Jesus christ, do they give you any justification for WHY, or are they
> just
> getting off on issuing fatwas?
They just say:
"As per recent discusions on debian-devel, the package name
"addressview-framework" is
too generic and abuse of the shared resource, package namespace.
The later may be controversial: the former should not be."
Or are you the one who has refused it?
No. I just try to colect opinions to solve this (ridiculous) issue.
Eric