[Debian GNUstep maintainers] Bug#304968: marked as done (gnustep-base should not enter in sarge now)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner@bugs.debian.org
Tue, 03 May 2005 02:18:22 -0700
Your message dated Tue, 03 May 2005 11:14:20 +0200
with message-id <427740EC.6010203@gnustep.fr.st>
and subject line Bug#307290: addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot find protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 20:43:35 +0000
>From eric@gnustep.fr.st Sat Apr 16 13:43:35 2005
Return-path: <eric@gnustep.fr.st>
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DMu8d-0006mm-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 13:43:35 -0700
Received: from localhost (unknown [82.230.27.192])
by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656551734D4
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 22:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eric by localhost with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DMu8b-0001Ah-HT
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 22:43:33 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Heintzmann <eric@gnustep.fr.st>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gnustep-base should not enter in sarge now
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 22:43:33 +0200
Message-Id: <E1DMu8b-0001Ah-HT@localhost>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gnustep-base
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
gnustep-base 1.10.2 should stay in sid untill gnustep-gui and gnustep-back are
ready to enter in sarge and all gnustep apps are successfully tested or rebuilt.
We want to keep sarge clean.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304968-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2005 09:14:51 +0000
>From eric@gnustep.fr.st Tue May 03 02:14:51 2005
Return-path: <eric@gnustep.fr.st>
Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.28]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DStUQ-00064p-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 02:14:51 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0312.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C6F6E1C000CA
for <304968-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 3 May 2005 11:14:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.50] (AToulouse-207-1-5-166.w80-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.14.195.166])
by mwinf0312.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7FEDD1C00112;
Tue, 3 May 2005 11:14:19 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: 20050503091419524.7FEDD1C00112@mwinf0312.wanadoo.fr
Message-ID: <427740EC.6010203@gnustep.fr.st>
Disposition-Notification-To: Eric Heintzmann <eric@gnustep.fr.st>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 11:14:20 +0200
From: Eric Heintzmann <eric@gnustep.fr.st>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, 304968-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#307290: addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot find
protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol'
References: <E1DSYAD-0005Ni-9X@localhost.localdomain> <42766B8B.8090103@gnustep.fr.st> <20050503022204.GB10227@mauritius.dodds.net> <427734F2.6050301@gnustep.fr.st> <20050503082436.GD11807@mauritius.dodds.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050503082436.GD11807@mauritius.dodds.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: 304968-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Steve Langasek a =E9crit :
>On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:23:14AM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
> =20
>
>>>>>With the attached patch, 'addresses-for-gnustep' can be compiled
>>>>>on i386/testing. There is a new version of addresses-for-gnustep
>>>>>in sid which already has this patch applied, but which will probably
>>>>>not enter sarge because of #304968.
>>>>> =20
>>>>>
>
> =20
>
>>>>#304968 will be closed when gnustep-back will be a valid candidate (i=
n 2=20
>>>>days).
>>>> =20
>>>>
>
> =20
>
>>>gnustep-back is a valid candidate tomorrow; you ought to close this bu=
g=20
>>>now.
>>> =20
>>>
>
> =20
>
>>What bug should I close now :
>>#304968 (gnustep-base)
>>or #307290 (addresses-for-gnustep)
>>or both ?
>> =20
>>
>
>If what you want is for gnustep-{base,back,gui} to go in when gnustep-ba=
ck
>is a valid candidate, then you should close 304968 now.
> =20
>
done.
>And then 307290 can be closed once they're all accepted into testing.
>
OK.
Thanks, Eric