[Debian GNUstep maintainers] request for help: oolite

[Ivan Vučica]

Yes, I think that's what was stated in the sentence "a patch for 1.24.9 in
Debian to add/use exitLock might be an option" means 0:-)

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Eric Heintzmann <heintzmann.eric at free.fr>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> Le 01/08/2016 à 13:51, Richard Frith-Macdonald a écrit :
> >> On 1 Aug 2016, at 12:38, Ivan Vučica <ivan at vucica.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> This was my guess too, but it seemed like the use of exitLock is quite
> limited. I was not aware it was a recent change :-)
> >>
> >> Aside from someone trying to ask Oolite to fix their init, should we
> also cut a release of base then?
> >
> > I don't think base is anywhere near ready for the 1.25.0 release yet
> (but it's far too much changed and binary incompatible  for another 1.24.?).
> >
> > I would imagine a 1 line fix to explicitly initialise (for instance)
> NSDate might solve things in Oolite.
> >
> > Alternatively, a patch for 1.24.9 in Debian to add/use exitLock might be
> an option.
> Now gnustep-make is uploaded, I'm going to prepare an upload this
> week-end to close the RC bug in gnustep-base package( by disabling
> concurrent.m test).
> Do you think that add/use exitLock is preferable ?
>
> Eric
>