Bug#384324: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package

Wed Aug 23 16:58:04 UTC 2006

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 04:05:49PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> Can I ask how this should have been handled, as the two packages provide
> the same files, but a security bug prompted an API change, hence the new
> package?

Why is this package important at all? It barely fullfills the
conditions.

> Is it satisfactory for this bug to wait and be resolved by the removal
> of -2?

If you are going to request removal now, it is okay. The problem that
debootstrap only supports that as it simply discards it and cdebootstrap
choke on it.

Bastian

-- 
No one wants war.
		-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7