Accepted gnutls26 2.12.23-2 (source all i386)

Julien Cristau jcristau at debian.org
Thu May 16 20:52:32 UTC 2013


On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 19:16:06 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:

> On 2013-05-16 Philipp Kern <pkern at debian.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > > If the libraries aren't intended to be co-installable, why are they in
> > > > separate source packages?
> >> The library packages are co-installable, the development packages
> >> can't be, due to libtasn1.so.
> 
> > What's the reason for them being versioned?
> 
> There was a minor API break, e.g. gnutls << 2.12.21 cannot be build
> against libtasn1-6.
> 
That's not a reason to version the dev packages.  Especially if you
don't plan on keeping both around for a long time.

Cheers,
Julien
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnutls-maint/attachments/20130516/d08e5c2f/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Pkg-gnutls-maint mailing list