Bug#749854: Allow bootstrapping without texlive and gtk-doc-tools

[Peter Pentchev]

On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:17:14AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-05-30 Peter Pentchev <roam at ringlet.net> wrote:
> [...]
> > What do you think about the attached patches that, only for the case of
> > building in the "stage1" profile designed for bootstrapping, disable the
> > rebuild of the PDF documentation so that libtasn1-6 no longer
> > build-depends on texlive-latex-base?
> [...]
> 
> Hello Peter,
> 
> Sorry to bother you again.
> 
> Instead of patch2 I would rather move texlive-latex-base/gtk-doc-tools
> (and change the package to still build correctly, of course ;-).

I assume you meant "move... to Build-Depends-Indep" here :)

> Assuming our bootstrapping process is not very stupid and defers or
> does not build binary-all packages this should also make 749855
> superfluous.
> 
> Any comments from your side?

This is actually the best solution.  Yes, the bootstrap builds only
the arch-specific packages, it uses the ready-made arch:all packages
from the archive, so everything should be fine and there need be no
build-profile-specific changes to debian/control indeed.

I'll come back to you with a patch in a couple of hours.  Thanks!

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev	roam at ringlet.net roam at FreeBSD.org p.penchev at storpool.com
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115  C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
I am the meaning of this sentence.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnutls-maint/attachments/20140602/1e111ac1/attachment.sig>