Bug#749854: Allow bootstrapping without texlive and gtk-doc-tools
ametzler at bebt.de
Sat May 31 13:43:46 UTC 2014
On 2014-05-30 Peter Pentchev <roam at ringlet.net> wrote:
> The first patch moves the PDF, HTML and info documentation into a brand
> new package, libtasn1-6-doc. The goal here is to be able to disable the
> build at package granularity level: no matter what profile we're
> building in, if we build a binary package it should have the same
> contents as if it were built in any other profile (including the default
> one). So to disable the PDF documentation build, we move the PDF
> documentation to a package that may be omitted entirely.
is this a suggestion, a requirement or a hard target? i.e. would it
also be acceptable to simply support building without documentation,
generating a slightly stripped down version of libtasn1-6-dev?
I would prefer to not introduce an additional binary package for the
documentation but if it is necessary for better bootstrapping I sure
would consider it.
thanks, cu Andreas
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
More information about the Pkg-gnutls-maint