Bug#765430: ldd: no version information available (required by /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcrypt.so.20)

Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Wed Oct 15 17:19:32 UTC 2014


On 10/14/2014 11:17 PM, Tim Connors wrote:
> Package: libgcrypt20
> Version: 1.6.2-4
> Severity: normal
> 
> Looks like dependencies on libgpg-error not specified correctly?
> 
> 361711,14> ldd /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcrypt.so.20
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcrypt.so.20: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgpg-error.so.0: no version information available (required by /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcrypt.so.20)
>         linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff73dfc000)
>         libgpg-error.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgpg-error.so.0 (0x00007f328620f000)
>         libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f3285e67000)
>         /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f3286719000)
> 
> This breaks the like of pasuspender:
> 
> 361712,15> /usr/bin/pasuspender /bin/true
> /usr/bin/pasuspender: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgpg-error.so.0: no version information available (required by /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcrypt.so.20)

fwiw, i don't think this is due to the fact that libgpg-error only
recently (as of 1.14, i think) adding a GPG_ERROR_1.0 version node in
its library symbols.

I believe this should just be a warning, and not a hard error, though.

See the discussion with libgpg-error upstream here:

 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.alioth.pkg-gnupg.general/270

	--dkg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnutls-maint/attachments/20141015/f0c15334/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-gnutls-maint mailing list