Remmina 1.2 backport

Raphaël Halimi raphael.halimi at gmail.com
Sun Sep 17 15:37:30 UTC 2017


Le 17/09/2017 à 14:07, Andreas Metzler a écrit :
> I suspect from there on follows some contradicting views on what gcrypt
> is believed to support. - These two #defines are missing, but there are
> other condionals defines relating to GCRYPT_VERSION_NUMBER.
> Anyway, this is a bug in cmake/Modules/FindGCrypt.cmake.
> 
> So a gcrypt backport is not needed.
> 
> You might be wondering why libgcrypt 1.7.6-2+deb9u2 triggers the bug.
> Well, that is
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgcrypt20/+bug/1700157 which
> was fixed 1.7.8-1.

Hi,

Thanks a lot for investigating this.

However, I fail to understand why you state that a backport isn't
needed. Unless there is a plan to cherry-pick the fix for this bug and
include it in a future Stretch point release, libssh (and thus, Remmina)
can't be backported to Stretch.

Regards,

-- 
Raphaël Halimi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1000 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnutls-maint/attachments/20170917/f9532584/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-gnutls-maint mailing list