[pkg-go] RFS: fleet -- Distributed init system using systemd and etcd

Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) timothy.potter at hp.com
Tue Jun 30 05:41:03 UTC 2015

On 30 Jun 2015, at 6:06 am, Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg at debian.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) <timothy.potter at hp.com> wrote:
> On 23 Jun 2015, at 5:34 pm, Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg at debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply. In the meantime, we’ve changed the library naming conventions in http://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/packaging.html, so could you please adjust the package names?
> >
> > Let me know when you want me to take another look.
> OK I’m all done with renaming for packages that have not been uploaded yet.  Could you take a look?  I’ve found some non-determinism in one of the tests for goini so that and it’s antecedent globalconf can’t be uploaded yet.
> golang-goini -> golang-github-glacjay-goini
> Uploaded.


> golang-globalconf -> golang-github-rakyll-globalconf
> Depends on goini, so I can’t upload it yet.

Still working on a fix for this.  I think there is an upstream bug that needs resolving first.
> golang-go-uuid -> golang-github-pborman-uuid
> This one still has export DH_GOPKG := code.google.com/p/go-uuid/uuid in its debian/rules. Is that an oversight? In debian/{control,copyright}, you use https://github.com/pborman/uuid

I’m not sure.  Fleet refers to it using the code.google.com namespace so it’s consistent in that respect, but not with the repository location.  The tests refer to the package as just “uuid”.  Not sure what the right answer here is. 

> Should I rename golang-go-semver and golang-clockwork?  They’re in testing but aren’t dependencies of any other packages yet so now would be a good time to re-upload them with new names I think.
> I’ll deal with them later, ideally in an automated fashion. Currently, the first renamed package is still in NEW, but once it’s through and hence has validated our strategy, we can come up with a concrete plan.

I wasn’t expecting this answer and yesterday I performed and pushed a rename of these two packages.  I can revert if that messes up your plans otherwise they can be re-pushed in the interests of consistency.

> Are there any other not-yet-uploaded Go packages you want me to take a look at?

No, I think that’s it for the moment.



> -- 
> Best regards,
> Michael

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3354 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-go-maintainers/attachments/20150630/c67532bd/attachment.bin>

More information about the Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list