[pkg-go] BTS best practice

Paul Tagliamonte paultag at debian.org
Wed Sep 9 02:15:22 UTC 2015

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:00:48PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Dear Golang team,
> I just want to remind everybody to tag uploaded ITP bugs as "pending" and to 
> maintain "block" relationships between ITP/RFP bugs. This is helpful for 
> those of us who work with hierarchies of dependencies.

I don't know that I'll go out of my way to do that -- but NEW is exposed
via RFC822[1] control format. It'd be trivial to ensure all the Closes:
for each entry in NEW are marked as pending. That might be a generally
fun thing to have running, or perhaps patch dak to do that for policy

Patches welcome for that for dak, I think. In the meantime, my ITPs will
likely not say 'pending', I don't really see the purpose.


[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-go-maintainers/attachments/20150908/4162053e/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list